The Pagan Origin of the Papal System and Its Connection with
Clericalism
We have noticed the
motives and ideas which led church leaders in the third and fourth centuries to
facilitate the united worship of pagans and Christians, and to adapt heathen
observances and ceremonies to those of the Church in its apostate condition.
The ingenuity with which this was accomplished was extraordinary. At the back
of it lay the mistaken notion that, apart altogether from repentance and
regeneration through faith, the nations of the world were gradually being
incorporated into the Kingdom of God. Behind all this was the subtle scheming
and operation of Satan and his hosts, into whose hands the churches had played,
by their substitution of human aims, arrangements and expedients for the
revealed will of God in the Scriptures. We can trace the craft of the evil one
in preparing the way for this corruption.
The various heathen
religions which were brought into requisition to enhance the power and extend
the scope of the Church, had a common origin in the primitive postdiluvian
worship of nature instead of the true God. The earliest systematization of this
took place under that Nimrod of whom a brief account is given in Genesis 10,
the center of whose pristine kingdom was Babel, and who sought, in establishing
that city as the center of his power, to redress the disaster of the scattering
of the people from the locality, consequent upon the confounding of their
language. * Authentic sources of information, derived from history and
discovery, show that, upon the death of Nimrod, his wife, Semiramis,
inaugurated his deification as the sun god, and, in the further systematization
of the Chaldean “Mysteries,” established the veneration of herself as the
mother of the gods. The worship of the sun god was maintained by a large number
of celibate priests, whose ordination was accompanied by the mark of the
circular tonsure, the emblem of the sun. This order of priesthood spread into
most of the surrounding nations. Roman historians record how when the worship
of the Babylonian goddess was introduced into pagan Rome, it was established by
celibate and tonsured priests. Early in the Christian era, in the
Christ-dishonoring process of the amalgamation of paganism with Christianity,
the prelates of the corrupt Church system adopted these heathen customs. In
Egypt in the fourth century the tonsured, celibate priests of the goddess Isis
were being regarded as the ministers of Christ.
At the death of Nimrod,
sun worship received an important modification, through the ingenious and
unprincipled scheming of Semiramis. Nimrod, whose death was to be celebrated by
a period of mourning, must be venerated as her offspring, “the seed of the
woman,” and she herself as the queen of heaven. In course of time the worship
of mother and child, spreading from Babylon, became general in the heathen
world with amazing rapidity, and was adopted with unbounded enthusiasm. In
Egypt they were known as Isis and Osiris; in Asia Minor as Cybele and Deious,
or Bacchus; in Greece as Ceres and Plutus; in Italy as Venus and Jupiter; in
Syria and Palestine as Astarte and Tammuz, or Adonis.
Nimrod’s death was
celebrated yearly throughout the various countries by a period of lamentation,
and to this the passage in Ezekiel refers in which the Lord is revealing to the
prophet the abominations practiced in Jerusalem. Brought to the door of the
gate of the Lord’s house which was toward the north, he there saw “women
weeping for Tammuz” (Ezek. 7:14). Similarly the Egyptians wept over Osiris, and
the people of Greece and Italy bewailed the death of Bacchus. There are
evidences of the same practice in the ancient history of nations of the Far
East, as well as amongst the Indians of America and Mexico.
In the Spring season
forty days of fasting were set apart previous to the actual celebration of the
death, and everywhere the idea was borrowed from the custom initially
instituted in the worship of the Babylonish goddess and her child. Pagans in
Kurdistan observe the period up to the present time. Humboldt records a similar
observance amongst the Mexicans. The forty days of fasting and lamentation were
followed by a commemoration of the rebirth of the god. All this, with the
heathen rites associated with it, was introduced into the churches in
Christendom by the unscrupulous methods of ecclesiastical leaders. In this way
the grossest corruption and superstitions spread into the Church.
What the apostle
records, in Romans 1:23–25, of the effects, in the heathen world, of exchanging
the truth of God for a lie, and worshiping the creature rather than the
Creator, was verified in Church history. All the revelries of the carnival in
connection with Lent thus became associated with the professed commemoration of
the Death and Resurrection of Christ. So successfully had Satan prepared the
way, for centuries previous to the Christian era, for the hideous mockery of
God, the grossest travesty of the Incarnation, atoning death and glorious
resurrection of our Lord, and for the perversion of the truth by a corrupt and
decadent Church, under the base and carnal aims of its leaders. The plans of
the Adversary were laid with consummate ingenuity, all, however, under the
ordering of God, whose righteous retribution falls upon man when he willfully
rejects the Light.
In this way, too, the
evil one prepared the way for the travesty of the blessed Trinity. Babylonish
nature worship led to the veneration of Father, Mother and Child. The mother
was the queen of heaven. How the people of Israel were corrupted in this
respect is recorded by Jeremiah: “The children gather wood, and the fathers
kindle the fire, and the women knead the dough to make cakes to the queen of
heaven” (Jer. 7:18; see also 44:17). The worship of the mother gained
precedence over that of the child. She, the favored object of worship, was
deified as well as her son, and is represented in the inscriptions of heathen
nations as the one who was destined to crush the serpent’s head. She became
venerable as the Alma Mater and the Virgin Mother. It is significant, for
instance, that practically all the details connected with the cult of the
Ephesian Diana are identical with what is known of the worship of the
Babylonian goddess. In many countries she was regarded as the incarnation of
the spirit of peace and love and the source of life. As the mother of the gods
she became the object of almost universal worship, and everywhere her cult was
associated with the utmost licentiousness.
When the corrupted form
of Christianity gained ascendancy over the nations, the worship of the
Babylonish goddess was replaced by the worship of the Virgin Mary and her
child. Pagans were taught simply to substitute Mariolatry for their accustomed
object of veneration. The Madonna of Rome is really the Madonna of Babylon.
Mary came to be regarded as the tabernacle of God with men, and the creature
was blasphemously substituted for the Creator.
The evil one not only
designed to keep the Christ of God before the eyes of Christendom as a child, he
prepared the way, too, for a gross misrepresentation of the work of the Cross.
The shape and sign of the cross, so abundantly in vogue in Christendom, was not
primarily derived from the Cross of Calvary (which was probably of very
different form), but from the mystic emblem of the ancient Chaldean rites and
ceremonies, the evil meaning of which it is not incumbent to explain here. It
served also to represent the initial letter of the god Tammuz, evidences of
which are found on ancient coins. The letter was marked on the foreheads of
those who were initiated in the mysteries, a ceremony accompanied by the
sprinkling of water on the brow. In order to identify Tammuz with the sun a
circle frequently was placed upon it, thus \. By way of variety the
sign was inserted in the circle, thus [.
The discoveries of Layard at Nineveh made clear
that the sign was thus connected with sun worship. It passed into almost
universal use in the heathen world. The vestal virgins, or prophetesses of
pagan Rome, suspended it as a charm from their necklaces. It was marked on the
garments of the priests. The emblem was the object of worship by the pagan
Celts long before the time of Christ, and there are evidences of its use in
most of the heathen tribes of the ancient world. Stone crosses were erected in
Mexico ages before the first Roman Catholic missionaries went there. In Egypt
and other lands the emblem was regarded as the sign of life, and was supposed
to have healing virtues.
It is in Egypt, indeed,
that this pagan emblem seems first to have found its way into Christian
churches. The bishops in that country were prominent in furthering the
extensive incorporation of heathens into the Church and in the general
adaptation of heathen rites, ceremonies and emblems to the Christian religion.
It was especially pleasing to pagans to continue the use of their idolatrous
cross or Tau emblem under the patronage of ecclesiastics and the auspices of
the Church.
There is no evidence
that Christ was executed on a cross of this shape. Crucifixion was frequently
carried out on a tree trunk or stake (which is the actual meaning of the word stauros).
It was certainly contrary to the mind of the Lord and to apostolic teaching
that anything like a crucifix should be used to commemorate the Lord’s death.
When the facts are known the difference between the actual occurrence of the
crucifixion of Christ and the superstitious representations and emblems of
apostate Christianity, with all their foul and idolatrous origin, is startling
in the extreme.
The aim, then, of God’s
arch adversary was so to obscure the facts and meaning of the work of Calvary
as to keep before the world the idea of Christ either as a babe in His mother’s
arms, or as a corpse on a crucifix. What was fundamental to the Christian faith
in the facts of the Incarnation and the death of the Lord was so perverted as
to overshadow the facts of the living Christ raised and glorified, the Savior
of all who believe.
The way was paved for
the admission of all these abominations into the churches by the rise and
progress of the clerical system of priestcraft which we have considered in
former chapters. Once men begin to depart from the truth of God they play into
the hands of Satan, and open the way for all manner of evil. One step taken,
others inevitably follow, unless there is an immediate return to the right ways
of the Lord. More remains to be said in connection with these matters.
Sufficient has already been stated to indicate the significance of the title,
“Babylon the Great,” in Revelation 17:5, and what is there revealed concerning
it.
The earliest known
systematized form of nature worship, which originated in Babylon, centered, as
we have observed, in the veneration of the sun. In addition to the signs and
emblems previously mentioned as characterizing the cult, and which were
eventually adopted early in the Christian era by the apostate Church, the
nature of the pagan sacrifices also bears witness to the Satanic efforts to
forestall and eventually pervert the truth relating to the sacrifice of Christ
and its significance. These offerings consisted of thin round cakes which were
presented to the queen of heaven (originally Semiramis, the wife of Nimrod),
and were accompanied by the burning of incense and the pouring out of drink
offerings, idolatrous practices which, as we have noticed, spread amongst the
people of Israel in the later times of their departure from God. Hence the
remonstrance of Jeremiah to which reference has already been made, “the women
knead the dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink
offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke Me to anger” (Jer. 7:18).
When, in the fourth
century of the present era, the worship of the queen of heaven passed into
vogue in the churches, as the worship of the Virgin Mary, the heathen custom of
the round wafer was likewise incorporated into church worship by the bishops in
their various dioceses. By this means the character of the Lord’s Supper, with
its significant yet simple elements as instituted by Christ Himself, became
perverted. The remembrance of the Lord and the commemoration of His death,
observed in all its divinely appointed simplicity by the apostles and believers
in the first century, when on the first day of the week they met to break bread
in fulfillment of His command, became entirely changed into a superstitious
ceremony, adopted in Christendom in order to please the susceptibilities of
heathen people and make it possible for them to worship under the auspices of
the Church without departing from their heathen customs.
The insistence upon the
roundness of the wafer had no connection with the paschal loaf of the Jews. No
commandments were given to Israel as to its shape. In the heathen world the
thin round cake was placed on the altar in commemoration of the sun god. In
Egypt, for instance, the wafer was presented in celebration of the sun deity
Osiris, who by his rebirth had become the life and nourishment of the souls of
men. What a significant anticipatory counterfeit of the Incarnation and death
of Christ! The round wafer, symbol of an incarnate heathen deity as the bread
of life! And this long before the actual birth of our Lord! How evidential of
this heathen origin is the prayer of the Roman litany offered in the
celebration of the Mass, “Bread corn of the elect, have mercy upon us.”
Moreover, the ecclesiastical command requiring that those who partake of the
wafer are to do so absolutely fasting, is the same injunction as was laid down
in connection with the Babylonish sun worship, and is entirely contradictory to
the fact that the Lord instituted the feast of remembrance immediately the
disciples had partaken of the Passover Feast.
The offering of the
wafer as a bloodless sacrifice, presented in heathendom before the Christian
era, and continued as a sacrifice in the degenerate churches of Christendom, is
thus a travesty of the sacrifice of the Cross and not a commemoration of it.
So with the letters
I.H.S., which are used in connection with the wafer and in other respects.
These stood originally for the initials of the Egyptian trinity, Isis, Horus,
Seb. Ecclesiastical ingenuity transferred them to the words “Iesus Hominum
Salvator,” “Jesus of men the Savior.” The motto in its latter significance is
true indeed and good in itself, but its heathen connection and the motive for
its adoption, namely, the incorporation of unregenerate heathen into the
Church, and the pagan use of it in connection with the sacrifice of the wafer,
have degraded it. They were sad times in Church history when the sacrifice of
the Mass, with all its gross superstitions, superseded the simple observance of
the Lord’s Supper according to His institution, and the false teaching was
promulgated that the symbols are changed at consecration into the actual body
and blood of the Lord, a doctrine “repugnant to the plain words of Scripture.”
Other heathen customs
were likewise incorporated. The rosary, an instrument of extreme antiquity in
pagan nations, especially among Buddhists, was adopted in the churches long
before Dominic preached and popularized it. The use of wax candles, incense,
images, the practice of lustrations and of processions, the wearing of
vestments, the adoption of the miter, derived from the fish god worship of the
Babylonians and Philistines (a perpendicular representation of the fish head,
and entirely to be distinguished from the Aaronic turban), and other forms of
ecclesiastical ritualism, the enumeration of which would unduly burden these
pages, all sprang from the same source. Priestcraft early paved the way for
them all. The plea for their adoption was the recommendation of the Christian
faith to the heathen by the attractive grandeur of a religion superior to their
own. The favor of the emperors, the priestly assumption and worldly aspirations
of the bishops and the indifference of the laity, all contrived to obscure the
true Christian faith and suppress the operations of the gospel. Church decrees
usurped the authority of Holy Scripture. The Word of God was set aside for the
reception of heathen observances. Forms and ceremonies supplanted the guidance
and power of the Spirit of God. Ritualism superseded divine and apostolic
simplicity, and superstition was substituted for faith.
Satan is ever on the
alert to take advantage of the neglect of God’s Word and of deviation from His
will as revealed therein. The adversary’s plans had been skillfully laid, his
idolatrous agencies in the heathen world were ready, and when once the Church
ecclesiastics had opened the way for his inroads by their departure from the principles
and injunctions laid down in the Scriptures, his Babylonish cult was foisted
upon the churches to their utter undoing, with the result of the establishment
of a false religious system which has rendered men and nations blind to the
light of the gospel and the truth of God. “Babylon the great … hath made all
the nations to drink the wine of the wrath of her fornication” (Rev. 14:8).
* Chronologically
Genesis 11:1–9 precedes Genesis 10:8, 14, the latter passage forming part of a
genealogical chapter.
No comments:
Post a Comment