Steps Toward the Papal System
During the course of the second
century the departure from the divine instructions given by the apostles
developed into a still more highly organized system. Regard was had to the
opinions of church leaders and to matters of convenience, rather than to the
Word of God and apostolic teaching. The various countries where churches had
been formed were divided into ecclesiastical “provinces,” which were called
dioceses. The rural churches were maintained under the supervision of city
bishops, who claimed the right to appoint the various officebearers. These
included an additional order of district bishops for the supervision of the
subdivisions of the provinces. Thus there came into being a distinct class of
ecclesiastics between the controlling city bishops and the presbyters. They
were subordinate to the former, but exercised authority over the latter.
The multiplication of offices only
tended to enhance the unscriptural distinction which had arisen between
officiating priests and those who were regarded as the nonpriestly laity. This
was nothing but Judaism foisted upon Christianity. While the New Testament
speaks of elders and deacons, it contains not a hint about such an ecclesiastical
caste as a set of priests acting between God and members of the churches. On
the contrary, such a system is a complete contravention of the divine will. The
apostles taught that believers are constituted into a “holy priesthood to offer
up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God through Jesus Christ” (1 Pet. 2:5).
They are all “a royal priesthood” (v. 9), “a kingdom of priests” (Rev. 1:6).
A further step toward the erection
of the papal structure was the establishment of church councils or synods, for
each of which, naturally, a president became necessary. What gave rise to these
was the increase of controversies upon matters of doctrine and discipline. Had
the churches adhered from the first to the faith committed to them by the
apostles, and thus followed the teaching of the Word of God, each church acting
under its own divinely appointed elders, in simple dependence upon the guidance
and power of the Spirit of God, such difficulties would have found a more or
less ready solution, or at least would have been confined to the particular
church where trouble had arisen. Adherence to the Word of truth receives the
ready aid of the Holy Spirit in instruction and correction. But matters had
gone too far for any general return to the faith. Human counsels had prevailed
in bringing about the single minister system, and consequently human counsels
continued to guide the successive steps of declension from the will of God.
Where the prerogatives of the Spirit of God are ignored one or other of two
things must follow, disintegration or humanly devised systematization, each
being lawlessness in the eyes of God. Human expedients ever fail to accomplish
divine purposes.
When once the clerical system had
become dominant, appeals in cases of controversy were inevitably made to
ecclesiastical councils, consisting of the leading clerics in the provinces.
The function of president was usually discharged by the bishop of the chief
city of the province, who thus received the designation of the Metropolitan
Bishop, a title which eventually he retained in permanency, that is to say,
apart from the functioning of any particular council. This increasing
assumption of spiritual authority met with keen resistance on the part of the
presbyters. Hence arose the struggle between Episcopalianism and
Presbyterianism.
The process of declension from the
principles of the Word of God was temporarily retarded by the series of fierce
persecutions which transpired at intervals during the second and third
centuries and terminated in a.d.
313. Church testimony was indeed maintained and revived, not merely in spite
of, but even by means of the purifying power of divine chastisement. “The gates
of Hades” could not prevail against the Church. The bush that Moses saw was not
consumed with the burning; God’s Israel still remains His people. So God’s true
Church can never be extinguished. Spiritual Babylon is doomed to destruction,
but never the Church of Christ.
Faithful companies of believers
continued in one place or another through all the vicissitudes of those times,
whether of calm or storm. But the counteracting effects of periodic persecution
failed to arrest permanently the general tendency to departure along the lines
which we are considering. The cessation of oppression witnessed the recrudescence
of the evil. There were indeed two potent influences from which it received a
mighty impetus, the one external, the other internal; the former that of
Imperial patronage, the latter the desire for worldly aggrandizement. These
were to one another largely as cause and effect. They combined to bring about
the almost universal introduction of heathen elements and practices into the
churches, which produced the corruptness of the fully developed religious
system of later times.
If the unscriptural ministerial
organization was successful to some degree in preventing division, it failed to
resist the soul-withering effects of worldliness. On the contrary, the priestly
assumption of the clergy fostered it. The churches must forsooth rival the
earthly glory of pagan religions. It would not do for the Church to suffer the
contempt of the heathen. Let the churches erect ornate places of worship,
temples which should at least compare favorably with heathen fanes and outstrip
them if possible in worldly grandeur! Idolatrous priests had ever held favor at
court and obtained the patronage of men of high rank. Let the bishops be
received on equal terms that the dignity of the Church may be maintained in the
eyes of the world! Alas for the Church when it joins hands with the world! Far
better the humble, saintly, Spirit-guided worship of the catacombs! Far better
the deep and holy spiritual joy that springs up under the pressure of the
world’s hatred! “It is enough for the disciple that he be as his Master, and
the servant as his Lord” (Matt. 10:25). The world rejected and persecuted Him
and they would do the same to His followers. “But all these things,” He said,
“they will do unto you for My Name’s sake, because they know not Him that sent
Me” (John 15:21). Identification with Christ will produce the world’s contempt
as long as the present age lasts. The god of this world ever stirs up its
malice against those who prove faithful to the Lord. This is their glory. It
carries with it the joyous certainty of eternal reward.
The skill of the evil one is
unceasingly expended in attempting to allure the saints from their allegiance
to the Lord, and to court the friendship of the world; so it was in the days
when persecution gave place to ease and prosperity, when the hiss of the
serpent was succeeded by his flattery. Association with the world always saps
the spiritual vitality of the believer. Here is the testimony of Cyprian,
bishop of Carthage, who lived from a.d.
200 to 258: “Forgetting what believers did in the times of the apostles, and
what they should always be doing, Christians labored, with insatiable desire,
to increase their earthly possessions.”
But the influence of the world is
traceable not merely to the changed attitude of the emperors or of the
political world under them in any given locality. Behind all this lay the
beginnings of departure from the divine counsels, in the establishment of the
system of clerisy and humanly devised institutions in place of that divinely
appointed, simple order of “elders in every church,” a plan so admirably suited
to every phase and condition of Church life and testimony.
No comments:
Post a Comment